Wealden discusses concerns with Housing Minister


Council leaders from across East Sussex, including representatives from Wealden District Council, met with the Minister for Housing last week to discuss matters affecting the delivery of each council’s Local Plan.

Leaders, Cabinet Members and Chief Executives from East Sussex County Council, Eastbourne, Hastings, Lewes, Rother and Wealden District and Borough Councils were present at the meeting.

The key issues discussed with Christopher Pincher MP were in relation to matters around plan delivery and the number of homes each council has been allocated to build by Government.

Cllr Ann Newton Portfolio Holder for Planning and Development at Wealden District Council, said:

There are a number of issues that collectively we felt needed be addressed with Government if we are to be successful in delivering local plans that meet the needs of our residents and the environment.

As Councils we need better control of the delivery of housing that we grant permission for to allow us to move delivery forward. Currently, we are in a situation where planning applications are granted and not built out for a number of years, if at all. This has a huge knock on effect on our ability to deliver housing in the right places and at the right time, alongside the timely investment in infrastructure.

We have great concerns, as do our residents, about the numbers of houses being built versus the adequate provision of healthcare and education services, robust service infrastructure such as water, sewerage and broadband, as well as being able to maintain roads and pavements. Without greater funding for these essential services, our towns and villages just will not cope with high numbers of additional housing.

Across the County, we have significant numbers of consents approved, but the current rules do not allow for many of these to be counted within our 5 year supply. We have therefore asked the Minister to review the approach to the 5 year land supply and provide us with additional powers to stop developers land banking consents.

Cllr Ann Newton, Portfolio Holder for Planning and Development

All local authorities in England are required to have a Local Plan detailing their positive vision for the future of each area, and a framework for addressing housing needs and other economic, social and environmental priorities.

Cllr Bob Standley, Leader of Wealden District Council continues:

Government provide us as Local Authorities with a housing target using their national formula. This formula uses household projections from 2014, [ignoring lower projections from 2016 and 2018], ignores environmental and other constraints within the county and builds in an over-supply of homes in order to drive down house prices. We have asked the Minister to address these clear flaws in the formula in order to reduce the number of homes we are required to build across the County.

Cllr Bob Standley, Leader of Wealden District Council

Once the Local Planning Authority has finished preparing and consulting on a local plan it is submitted to the Secretary of State who then appoints a Planning Inspector to carry out an independent examination. The Councils also raised concerns with the Minister around the length of time independent examination can take and the uncertainly this creates within local communities.

Following the outcome of the discussion, a further meeting has been requested to hear detailed feedback from the Minister on the points raised.

You might also be interested in reading the following recent article: Wealden demands fairer housing targets.



To make sure you are among the first to know what is going on in Crowborough - SUBSCRIBE to receive our email Newsletter.

Please click for more info.


  1. The trouble is that Wealden DC have failed to achieve a Local Plan over many years and have never developed a positive vision for the future of Wealden and a framework for addressing housing needs and other economic, social and environmental priorities. If they had, WDC, our local planning ‘authority’ would have been in a position now to control and designate development rather than having developer led planning and blaming their friends in the Conservative Government.

Share Your Views